When was romans 13 written

Paul is dealing with a group that hesitated to send contributions, and he urges them to contribute because it shows that through Christ equality has come upon both Judeans and Gentiles. As Nanos points out, this word for sword can also be used for the knife in circumcision Joshua , or it could be used metaphorically as a symbol of the authority of the synagogue rulers to inflict punishment. In this sense, the synagogue rulers are the interpreters of the Torah, and Paul encourages Gentile believers to give them their due respect.

No doubt many will not be convinced that the original context is a Judean one. They have been too mesmerized by only one perspective. They will continue to drink deeply from this passage to support giving allegiance to this program or that agenda of a secular government — but it is a dry hole.

David M. To see government authority as the focal point in this passage is an interpretative mirage. David May. Feature Podcast. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light. Let us walk properly, as in the day, not in revelry and drunkenness, not in lewdness and lust, not in strife and envy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to fulfill its lusts.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand : Because we know the danger of the times and we anticipate the soon return of Jesus, we should be all the more energetic and committed to a right walk with God instead of a sleep-walk with God.

How important it is to awake out of sleep! It is possible to do many Christian things and yet essentially be asleep towards God. Because one can do many religious things and still be asleep toward God, it is important for every Christian to make sure they are truly awake and active in their life before God. Cast off the works of darkness, and put on the armor of light : The illustration is from taking off and putting on clothes.

When you get dressed every day, you dress appropriately to who you are and what you plan to do. Therefore, everyday, put on the Lord Jesus Christ!

We must cast off before we can put on. There must be a taking away of the love of sin, there must be a renouncing of the practices and habits of sin, or else a man cannot be a Christian. It will be an idle attempt to try and wear religion as a sort of celestial overall over the top of old sins.

The works of darkness : These are characterized as revelry and drunkenness, licentiousness and lust, strife and envy. Lust in this passage has the idea of people who are lost to shame. They no longer care what people think and flaunt their sin openly, even proudly. When we put on Christ, we put on all the armor of God and are equipped to both defend and attack.

It means more than put on the character of the Lord Jesus Christ , signifying rather Let Jesus Christ Himself be the armor that you wear. Make no provision for the flesh : The flesh will be as active as we allow it to be.

God used this passage to show Augustine, the great theologian of the early church, that he really could live the Christian life as empowered by the Holy Spirit — he just had to do it. And so do we. Our website uses cookies to store user preferences.

By proceeding, you consent to our cookie usage. Please see our Privacy Policy for cookie usage details. We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website. Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features. The passage at hand only makes sense within the overarching context of Romans Although Paul undoubtedly changes topics at , the thematic links between and are difficult to ignore. Also, conceptually, vengeance is mentioned in and The links between this passage and the one immediately preceding it, however, should not overshadow the importance of the thematic verses earlier in There Paul effectively redefines the people of God as no longer just Jews, but Gentiles as well.

He then redefines in how the people of God in the church at Rome should relate to the power structures of the society in which they dwell. Romans is one of the most loosely-constructed passages in the entire epistle. This means that it would take quite a bit of time and space to comprehensively analyze the syntax and detailed meaning of the passage. However, some general observations are in order. Abhor what is evil, cling to what is good. Harmony is commanded within and outside the church, extending even to persecutors , However, the chapter division here has had detrimental effects on the exegesis of this passage.

Romans is most naturally read as the unpacking of the principles of , in the context of how Christians in Rome should behave in relation to the powers that governed the society in which they dwelt.

The specific rules that governed the theocracy of ancient Israel no longer held sway for the international and multi-ethnic body of Christ. As noted above, the situation in Rome, although relatively peaceful, was still quite tense within and outside of the church.

Jews and Gentiles were struggling to remain unified in the Messiah in spite of their cultural differences. Furthermore, Jews in Rome, only recently allowed back into the city, may have been culturally stigmatized as superstitious and unwanted. Tensions were building because of indirect taxation. And Jews in Palestine were growing more and more rebellious. It is not therefore hard to imagine why Paul felt the pastoral need to apply the principles of to the realm of society and government.

If the Christians in Rome made a wrong move, evil could quickly overcome them. While a full analysis of the argument of the text at hand is beyond the scope of this essay, a brief trace of the thought-flow of Romans will aid in comprehension of its contextually-appropriate meaning.

The general command to submit to the authorities is found in a, and is reiterated in The first reason for this submission is that the authorities have been appointed by God b. The second reason for submission is that the rulers are servants of God to commend good and to administer retribution to evil, although these two verses can also be seen as support for the claim that those who resist the authorities can expect judgment on earth [18] When unhindered by the chapter division, it is easy to see how Romans relates to The genuine love commanded in a would be quite hard to apply to the impersonal institution of the Roman government.

On the other hand, it would have been quite easy for the rebellious attitudes of the Jews in Palestine to seep into the Roman context, prompting the Roman Christians to rebel and try and institute the kingdom of God in opposition to Roman rule. Paul steps in and applies the principles of non-violence, non-retribution, and enemy love , 17, to the context of government and society.

It would be a mistake, however, to go to the other end of the spectrum and argue that Paul is urging his audience to give unthinking and critical approval of everything the Roman government did. It would also be a mistake to argue that Romans is a justification for the active participation in government activities political office, warfare, etc. After the sobering instruction to not rebel but to stay out of trouble and obey the governing authorities, Paul reminds his audience of the importance of love, not only of enemy of which it could be strongly argued that the governing authorities were a subset!

They were to faithfully follow Jesus the Messiah King, seeking to bring in his kingdom. Although it is tempting to take this passage out of context and use it to justify opinions on everything from immigration to just war theory, the same hubris that Paul implicitly rebukes in these verses must be resisted if the Scriptures are to be heard and appropriated well.

While some may wish that Romans had more to say regarding the relationship between church and state, the passage certainly cannot say less than the main points briefly described above.

Bray, Gerald, ed. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Romans.